Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKopper, Ákos
dc.contributor.authorJain, Rajendra K.
dc.contributor.authorKillander, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorMkhabela, Justice
dc.contributor.authorNkrumah, Bright
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Kevashinee
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Zirong
dc.contributor.authorYin, Lingying
dc.contributor.authorHe, Fei
dc.contributor.authorLi, Lifan
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-16T09:10:05Z
dc.date.available2017-03-16T09:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/20.500.11825/114
dc.description.abstractThis report presents a study of the EU’s efforts in promoting human rights towards three partner countries: India, South Africa and China. These three countries were chosen for three reasons. First, they are major global actors, second they are culturally different from the west and finally they all share a level of resentment against Europe promoting its values given their historical legacies (although in greatly different ways). The question this report aims to answer is how are EU’s efforts for human rights promotion received in these three countries. To answer this question four major issue areas were identified as angles of study: 1. Human Rights dialogues and consultations; 2. EU influencing and empowering local actors (such as NGOs or CSOs); 3. the link between Human Rights and economic/trade relations; and finally, 4. criticism formulated by these countries against the EU. In order to meaningfully answer these questions this report took the approach of introducing these issues from the perspective of the EU’s partner countries themselves. Thus, one FRAME partner from each country studied was offered a general framework to work with including specific questions and was asked to draft a case study accordingly. This approach has some obvious merits, but it also has some potential weaknesses. Benefits include that readers get the opportunity to learn about how the EU is seen from the outside, i.e. what aspects of its human rights policies are praised and what aspects of it are criticised. Furthermore, they can also read suggestions on how local experts advise the EU to improve its policies in helping their country to improve human rights conditions. The possible weakness is that this approach emphasises these issues from the partner countries’ perspectives, thus, for example, issues which are sensitive to discuss in the partner country may receive less attention in the study. […] Following the case studies, the report concludes with a brief summary of the study and a section that highlight the main issues and recommendation raised in the case studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFRAMEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDeliverable 6;5
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectpromotionen_US
dc.subjectIndiaen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.titleBilateral relations with China, India and South Africaen_US
dc.title.alternativeReport on case study: Bilateral relations with China, India and South Africaen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • 03. FRAME Reports
    The reports constitute the chief result of the work of over a hundred of scholars gathered under the umbrella of FRAME project researching the means to foster human rights among European policies.

Show simple item record